Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, LTD.
(763) 545-0443

Breast Augmentation Silicone Implants

Are Silicone Breast Implants Safe?

At Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, Ltd., we are committed to ongoing patient education and the provision of cosmetic surgery with a focus on long-term safety. As part of this commitment, our physicians and staff help patients thoroughly explore the details of breast enhancement with saline or silicone breast implants. We provide complimentary consultations at our Minneapolis / St. Paul area office. As leading Minnesota plastic surgeons, Dr. Richard H. Tholen and Dr. Douglas L. Gervais have the experience necessary to help you make informed surgical decisions. Both silicone and saline breast implants are FDA-approved.

History of Silicone Breast Implants

The modern era in breast enhancement began with the development and surgical implantation of silicone gel breast implants in a woman in 1963. In the 30 years that followed, plastic surgeons worldwide used silicone-gel-filled breast implants for both breast reconstruction and elective breast enlargement in well over one million women. Saline-filled breast implants were also used during this time, but in only about 15 percent of breast augmentation candidates undergoing surgery.

Breast implants were developed and utilized for more than a decade before the FDA began regulating medical devices in 1976; the safe and effective use of silicone in these and other medical products such as pacemaker insulation, lubrication for insulin needles, chemotherapy tubing, and artificial joints was well-established before the FDA could evaluate all of them. Because silicone breast implants and many other silicone medical devices were already in use prior to 1976, the ongoing use of these products was "grandfathered" by the FDA without formal evaluation and approval. None of these other silicone medical devices has been restricted or made unavailable to patients, but lack of formal FDA evaluation and approval of breast implants came into public awareness in the early 1990s.

The lay media has been responsible for spreading a great deal of information and misinformation regarding breast enlargement in the past decade and a half. Many women remember tabloid and TV talk shows' focus on the supposed problems claimed to be associated with silicone gel implants. Despite a lack of scientific data supporting these concerns, in 1992 the FDA restricted the use of silicone gel breast implants in women requesting elective breast augmentation.

At no point have silicone gel implants ever been “taken off the market,” but until November 2006 their use required enrollment in the FDA study that allowed only eligible patients and plastic surgeons access to them under strict guidelines. Since the FDA restrictions in 1992, numerous scientific studies (over 30 in the past decade) have continued to show NO cause-and-effect relationship between silicone gel breast implants and autoimmune-type illnesses (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, or so-called "human adjuvant" diseases). Since 1992, silicone gel breast implants have been used by plastic surgeons (including both Dr. Tholen and Dr. Gervais) involved in FDA-approved studies for patients undergoing breast reconstruction, breast augmentation revision (in certain patients), breast lift surgery, and for those patients with congenital breast deformities.

After exhaustive review of the past nearly four decades of use, the FDA approved the use of saline-filled implants in May 2000.

Late in 2003, the FDA reviewed all of the available scientific data about silicone gel implants, including very detailed information from implant patients over the prior decade, and heard testimony from patients, physicians, and researchers. The expert physician advisory panel to the FDA voted to recommend that the FDA approve the use of silicone breast implants for primary elective breast augmentation. However, the FDA deferred its decision, requesting "additional information" before granting approval.

In spring 2005, the FDA again revisited the request by both of the existing implant manufacturers for approval of general use of silicone gel implants; the expert physician advisory panel recommended approval for Mentor Corporation’s gel implants. Late in 2005, Both Mentor and INAMED® received letters of "[gel implant] product approvable" from the FDA.

On November 17, 2006 the FDA approved the use of silicone gel implants from both companies in patients over the age of 22, with certain restrictions, including involvement in the FDA study that has been ongoing for the past several years.

Opponents of silicone gel implants continue to claim that they cause autoimmune illness or are unsafe, but peer-reviewed scientific studies by many researchers and institutions have shown them to be safe and effective for their intended use. The controversy about silicone gel implants has made them one of the most intensely studied products in the entire medical marketplace.

As part of the 2006 FDA re-approval of silicone gel breast implants, each company has an informed consent booklet that you will be asked to read (and sign) prior to breast enhancement surgery. The FDA has made a controversial recommendation that patients with silicone gel breast implants undergo a MRI (magnetic resonance imaging, a non-X-ray study similar to a CAT scan) every two to three years to evaluate their implants (for leakage or rupture). Studies have shown that MRI evaluation of silicone implants has 79 percent effectiveness in detecting implant rupture or "leak." Thus, if you have no identifiable problem or concern with your implants and choose to follow this recommendation, you will require an unnecessary re-operation (for entirely normal non-ruptured implants) 21 percent of the time! The FDA makes this recommendation because physician examination has been shown to be unreliable in detecting silicone implant rupture. Yet, since present silicone implants are cohesive and cannot "leak," this is a nonsensical recommendation, in our opinion. If you are not having any kind of problem or concern with your implants, it is ridiculous to perform a costly procedure (that may not be covered by your insurance) and an often-inaccurate test that would require an operation (erroneously) over 20 percent of the time. Rather, we believe that if you have any issue at all with your silicone breast implants (size, shape, position, firmness, or concern about possible implant damage), return to your breast surgeon. We will then perform the corrective surgery where we will be able to examine, and replace if necessary, the implants under direct supervision. Our plastic surgeons can offer better than 79 percent accuracy with direct implant examination!

Implants and Breast Cancer — Mammography

Numerous scientific studies have shown that augmentation mammoplasty does not increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Even without a family history of breast cancer, a woman has an 11 percent risk of developing a breast cancer in her lifetime. If there is a family history of breast cancer, these risks are higher. It is important to realize that while breast enhancement surgery does not increase the risk of developing breast cancer, it also does not reduce the risk. Whether or not a woman is undergoing breast enhancement surgery with silicone or saline breast implants, she must continue breast self-examination, physician examination, and mammography. If you have any concern whatsoever regarding your breasts, the Board-certified plastic surgeons at Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, Ltd. are always happy to perform breast examination and answer any questions.

Mammography can still be done successfully in women who have undergone breast enlargement surgery.  Most radiologists feel that they can adequately view 99 percent of a woman's breast tissue even with implants in place, though special techniques and additional views may be necessary to accomplish this.

Although there is a slight chance that mammography might cause a leak or rupture of a saline breast implant, this is less likely with a soft, non-contracted breast, with smooth implants, and with submuscular placement. (The present generation of silicone implants is cohesive and cannot rupture.) Improperly-performed mammograms can forcibly compress and rupture the scar capsule around any kind of breast implant, so it is important to let the radiologist and technician that you have breast implants. A radiographic method called the Ecklund technique (also known as the displacement technique) compresses the breast tissue in front of the implant, and not only increases the visibility of breast tissue in the mammogram, but also reduces pressure on the implant. We do recommend a baseline mammogram one year after augmentation so that any scar tissue or calcium deposits within the breast are documented and available for comparison with any subsequent mammogram.

Learn More about Silicone Breast Implants and Breast Enhancement at Our Practice Serving Minneapolis / St. Paul, greater Minnesota, and the Upper Midwest

Whether you live in the Minneapolis / St. Paul area or out of state, our Board-certified plastic surgeons can help you learn more about breast enhancement surgery, silicone breast implants, and other options. Dr. Richard H. Tholen and Dr. Douglas L. Gervais provide free consultations to help patients explore their surgical options. To schedule your initial consultation, contact Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, Ltd. today.


back to top

Meet Our Team

Follow Us

LinkedIn Blog

Please contact Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, LTD. if you have any questions about our procedures or would like to schedule a complimentary consultation with one of our plastic surgeons.

* indicates a required field

To: Our Team
From: (email address)*

Hello, my name is*
I am interested in scheduling an appointment with you and would like to receive information about Please call me at at your earliest convenience.

Thank You!

Personalize My Message

Minneapolis Plastic Surgery, LTD.
4825 Olson Memorial Highway (Hwy 55) Suite 200
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422

Phone: (763) 545-0443
Fax: (763) 545-2784

Share |